Leicestershire County Council (25 019 724)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to change the social worker allocated to Miss X’s family, or about contact restrictions it enforced. There is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained the Council refused to change the social worker allocated to her family. Miss X also complained the Council restricted contact between her child (Y) and another relative (Z).
  2. Miss X said this caused extreme distress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X’s family had involvement with the Council’s children’s services, specifically with a social worker.
  2. Miss X complained the social worker showed bias, gave her false information and did not provide support. Miss X asked the Council to allocate a new social worker to the case.
  3. In its complaint response, the Council refused to allocate a new social worker. It said it did not consider this change would be in Y’s best interest.
  4. Miss X also complained the Council imposed restrictions on the contact between Y and Z. She said this was because Z had an ongoing police investigation.
  5. There is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our involvement here. The Council considered Miss X’s request for a new social worker and refused it. The Ombudsman cannot tell the Council it should change its decision, or allow Y to have contact with Z.
  6. As a publicly funded body we must be careful how we use our resources. Given there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by us investigating this complaint, it would not be proportionate for us to investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings