Oxfordshire County Council (25 017 945)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about how the Council dealt with a child protection referral. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation by the Ombudsman.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains about how the Council handled a referral about her son. She says the Council failed to recognise evidence provided by medical professionals. She also complains about complaint handling.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained to the Council that it refused to consider her complaint about a social worker coming to her home without an appointment. The Council said it would not consider her complaint because the visit was part of its statutory child protection duties.
  2. Ms X complained to the Ombudsman that the Council did not properly investigate a referral about her son or recognise evidence from other professionals.
  3. I will not investigate this complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions. Although Ms X says the referral was malicious, the Council had a statutory duty to investigate any referral it received.
  4. The Council considered information from professionals working with Ms X’s son, including his advocate, medical professionals and tutors. It considered Ms X’s views and tried to speak with her son independently to understand his wishes and feelings.
  5. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings