Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (25 015 226)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to consider Ms X’s concerns about her child’s health. There is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained the Council did not consider concerns she raised about the health of her child (Y). Ms X raised concerns about Y’s eating habits.
  2. Ms X said the matters caused a negative impact to her mental health.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council’s children’s services were involved with Ms X’s family.
  2. During this involvement, Ms X raised concerns about Y’s health. Ms X complained the Council did not properly consider her concerns.
  3. In its complaint response, the Council said health professionals had given opinions on Y’s health and did not share the same concerns as Ms X. It said it remained in contact with them as the involvement with the family was ongoing.
  4. The Council said it could not investigate the actions of the health professionals through its complaints process.
  5. The Council told Ms X she could contact the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) if she had concerns about the opinions of those professionals.
  6. There is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our involvement here. The Council explained it had relied on professional opinions when considering Ms X’s concerns about Y’s health. This is appropriate.
  7. We could not tell the Council it should investigate the actions of health professionals, or to disregard their opinions about Y’s health and take alternative action.
  8. As the Council outlined, Ms X could complain to the PHSO if she has concerns about the opinions given by the health professionals, as they investigate complaints about UK government departments, including the NHS.
  9. For these reasons, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings