Royal Borough of Greenwich (25 012 425)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to investigate Ms X’s concerns about its actions relating to a special guardianship order. It is unlikely we would find fault in the Council’s decision, not to consider it.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained to the Council about how it responded to her concerns relating a family member who she had responsibility for under a special guardianship order (SGO). She said it failed to properly support her financially and did not adequately respond to safeguarding concerns. Ms X said this occurred between 2015-2021. She said the Council’s action caused her financial hardship and stress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained to the Council, and it considered her complaint but declined to investigate the complaint further.
  2. The children’s statutory complaint procedure allows the Council to decline to take a complaint about matters which have occurred more than 12 months before a complaint was raised with it. It can do so, provided it explains its reasons why it has decided this, and does so on a case-by-case basis. The Council wrote to Ms X, explained its reasons in her case and therefore it is unlikely we would find fault if we were to investigate its decision.
  3. I have considered whether there are good reasons for us to exercise discretion to consider Ms X's complaint. I do not see the reasons provided are sufficient to explain the long period of time before this complaint was made to us. The law, explained in paragraph three, says we should not investigate late complaints. I acknowledge Ms X's comments about why she did not feel able to raise these matters sooner. But this does not displace the expectation in law that we will not investigate unless we are satisfied the reasons given are good reasons. 

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it is unlikely we would find fault in the Council’s decision to decline her complaint. And we will not consider it either because it is late.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings