London Borough of Lewisham (25 006 794)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms M’s complaint about her dealings with the Council when she asked for help to care for her daughter in 2023 because there has already been an independent investigation and there is nothing more we could add.

The complaint

  1. Ms M complained about her dealings with the Council in 2023 when she asked for help to care for her daughter, and later when she was discharged from hospital and did not return to the family home. Ms M is unhappy that her daughter was cared for by her father.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms M and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council considered Ms M’s complaint at all three stages of the Children Act complaints process. This is a formal procedure, set out in law, which councils must follow to investigate certain types of complaint. It involves:
    • a written response from the Council (Stage 1);
    • the appointment of an independent investigator to prepare a report (Stage 2); and, if the person making the complaint requests
    • an independent panel to consider their representations (Stage 3).
  2. The independent investigator produced a detailed report.
  3. The independent investigator and the independent panel did not uphold Ms M’s complaints. I have considered their findings carefully.
  4. We will not investigate Ms M’s complaints any further as there has already been an independent investigation. We could not add to what has already been said. There is no worthwhile outcome achievable.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms M’s complaint because there has already been an independent investigation and there is nothing more we could add.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings