Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council (25 000 785)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about whether the Council provided enough support to a school student. This is because the complaint is late.

The complaint

  1. Miss X and her mother Ms Y complain, through their solicitor, that the Council failed to support Miss X’s education, following a report from Ofsted to the Council about an incident at Miss X’s school. They state this had a negative impact on Miss X’s education.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X, Ms Y and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In 2023, Ms Y informed the Council of an incident which affected Miss X’s education. The incident caused the family concern about Miss X’s safety at school and affected Miss X’s attendance. Ms Y or her solicitor told Ofsted, and Ofsted contacted the Council. The Council conducted an investigation. The Council decided in August 2023 Miss X’s and Ms Y’s concerns did not meet the threshold for it to take further action. Miss X and Ms Y are dissatisfied with that decision.
  2. Miss X and Ms Y are also dissatisfied with the Council’s reported lack of support after then with Miss X’s school attendance and lack of educational provision when Miss X was not attending school. This relates to events in 2023 and the first half of 2024.
  3. Miss X and Ms Y then complained, through their solicitor, to the Council in February 2024. The Council sent its final response on 5 June 2024, saying Miss X and Ms Y could complain to us if they were dissatisfied. Miss X and Ms Y’s solicitor complained to us in April 2025. Therefore, the complaint to us was around 20 months after the Council had said it would not take further action on the incident and a year to two years from the incident affecting Miss X’s education to the complaint to the Council.
  4. Therefore, the restriction in paragraph 2 applies. I am mindful Miss X was a child at the time of the incident, and this would have been a difficult time for her. Nevertheless Ms Y pursued matters, they had legal representation and were able to report the incident to Ofsted and to complain to the Council within 12 months of becoming concerned. I also note there was a further delay of 10 months coming to us after the Council’s final response. In the circumstances, it is reasonable to expect Ms Y or her representative to have complained to us sooner.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because it is late without good enough reason to pursue it now.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings