Redcar & Cleveland Council (25 000 290)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the actions of a social worker and the response of Children’s Social Care. This is because it is unlikely investigation by us would lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained about the conduct of the Social Worker supporting her family. She said this impacted her children’s well-being and education.
  2. Ms X had a number of complaints upheld by the Council. She complained the Council has not made itself sufficiently accountable for these complaints or formally apologised.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained the Social Worker working with her and her family did not record their visits in detail. She complained the Social Worker did not provide accurate information about her and her family.
  2. In its complaint response the Council did not find concerns about the Social Workers conduct and explained its reasons. In response to a request, the Council did provide a different Social Worker.
  3. Ms X made complaints to the Council about matters including communication and delay. These complaints were upheld by the Council. Ms X complained the Council had not taken accountability or formally apologised.
  4. In its response the Council made a plan with Ms X about communication and information sharing and made recommendations for the wider team.
  5. The Council has identified it was at fault in some of Ms X’s complaint and has apologised to Ms X for any distress it caused.

We must use public money carefully and I do not think investigation by ourselves could add to the previous investigation by the Council or lead to a different outcome, therefore I will not investigate this complaint

Back to top

Final decision

We will not investigate Ms X’s’ complaint because it is unlikely investigation by us would lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings