Surrey County Council (24 023 046)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 02 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. The Information Commissioner is better placed to consider Mrs X’s complaint about inaccurate information held by the Council. Other matters would first need to be raised through the Council’s complaints procedure.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains about the actions of the Council’s children’s services. She says it recorded inaccurate information about her in an assessment, that it bullied her family and upset her child and broke her family up.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint unless we are satisfied the organisation knows about the complaint and has had an opportunity to investigate and reply. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to notify the organisation of the complaint and give it an opportunity to investigate and reply. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(5), section 34(B)6)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained to the Council in January 2024 about the contents of an assessment written by the Council’s children’s services. The Council offered to meet with Mrs X to discuss the inaccuracies and advised her of her right to rectification under GDPR.
  2. I will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. If she feels the Council is recording inaccurate personal information about her and it refuses to make amendments, then it would be reasonable for her to escalate the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). The ICO has powers to require rectification of incorrect data that we lack.
  3. Mrs X complained to the Ombudsman about other matters not raised in her complaint to the Council. I will not investigate these matters because they are premature. Mrs X will first need to raise this through the Council’s complaints procedure.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because the ICO is better placed to consider part of it and other parts are premature.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings