Cornwall Council (24 022 695)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to a safeguarding concern. It is unlikely we would find fault in the Council’s actions. Additionally, we cannot achieve the outcome Mr X is looking for.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained that after the Council completed safeguarding enquiries, and was unhappy the fact it had responded remained on his DBS record six months later.
  2. Mr X complained that this damaged his professional reputation and had a negative impact on his family.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained that following the Council’s safeguarding enquiries he was unable to find employment because of the information included on his DBS record.
  2. The Council said it responded to concerns raised by a Family Worker based on information it was provided and it then responded to a safeguarding concern.
  3. The Council clarified that when the outcome of the assessment indicated there were no safeguarding concerns it closed the case.
  4. The Council responded to Mr X’s complaint and explained it is not involved in the DBS process.
  5. We will not investigate this complaint, because given the Council’s explanations, it would be unlikely we would find fault in the Council’s actions. In any case, Mr X is seeking significant financial compensation, and we cannot achieve this outcome.
  6. If Mr X believes the Council is liable for loss of earnings and damages, he will need to pursue his claim through the courts as only they can establish liability in these circumstances.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is unlikely we would find fault and we cannot achieve what he is looking for.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings