Hertfordshire County Council (24 015 699)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the actions of the Council’s social worker in the course of child protection action. This is because investigation would not achieve the outcome the complainant wants.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Miss X, complains that the Council’s social worker has been at fault in the course of child protection action relating to her son.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X’s son is subject to a child protection plan. Miss X’s complaint concerns the actions of her son’s social worker. She complains that the social worker has acted with bias against her, and that her actions have facilitated parental alienation on the part of her son’s father.
  2. Miss X specifically complains about the way the social worker spoke to her during a core group meeting, which she says made her feel personally attacked. She wants the Council to replace the social worker.
  3. The Ombudsman will not investigate Miss X’s complaint. This is because investigation would not achieve the outcome she is seeking. It is for the Council to decide which of its officers to allocate to specific cases, and the Ombudsman will not express a view on the suitability of Miss X’s son’s social worker. The case correspondence shows that the Council has properly considered Miss X’s complaint. Our intervention would not lead to a different outcome and is not therefore warranted.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because investigation would not achieve what she is seeking.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings