Stoke-on-Trent City Council (24 014 541)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s actions in its child protection involvement with her family because it lies outside our jurisdiction. The law prevents us from investigating complaints about matters that are being considered in court proceedings. We have no discretion to do so.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Miss X, complains about the Council’s child protection actions and decisions in its involvement with her family. Miss X says a child protection plan was put in place on the basis of false information and she has been treated unfairly by social workers. She says the Council has not supported her or kept her updated and has called her a liar. The case is now subject to ongoing court proceedings.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X complained to the Council about the matters set out in paragraph 1, above.
  2. The Council told Miss X it will not consider her complaint via its complaints procedure because the matter is now subject to ongoing court proceedings. It explained it had reached its decision in line with the relevant statutory guidance which gives it discretion to decide not to investigate a complaint where to do so could prejudice ongoing proceedings. It advised Miss X to raise her concerns during the proceedings.
  3. We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint because it lies outside our jurisdiction. This is because the matters complained about are subject to ongoing court proceedings. The law prevents us from investigating complaints that are being, or have been, considered in court proceedings. We have no discretion to do so. Any dissatisfaction with the Council’s actions on the case should be raised to the court during the proceedings so that the judge can consider them before making a decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because it lies outside our jurisdiction and the law says we cannot consider it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings