Suffolk County Council (24 008 359)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council failed to act on a safeguarding referral regarding his child. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault in how the Council decided the matter was not a safeguarding issue. The Council apologised for its poor communication, and further investigation is unlikely to achieve any additional outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council failed to act on a safeguarding referral regarding his child, Y. Mr X also complained about poor communication from the Council.
  2. Mr X says the matter caused him frustration and uncertainty.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

Safeguarding referral

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council failed to act on a safeguarding referral regarding his child, Y.
  2. The Council made enquiries regarding the concerns and determined the matters raised did not present a safeguarding concern. There is insufficient evidence of fault in the process. Therefore, we will not investigate this complaint.

Poor communication

  1. In its complaint response to Mr X, the Council accepted it had not communicated with him effectively about the outcome of the referral. It apologised and explained the outcome. It also told Mr X it would remind staff to improve communication to ensure there is no recurrence of the fault.
  2. An investigation by the Ombudsman is unlikely to achieve any additional outcome. Therefore, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault regarding the primary issue, and further investigation is unlikely to achieve any additional outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings