Sheffield City Council (24 003 821)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Sep 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council abandoning plans to seek a court order to ensure the return of her child, and instead leaving the child with a parent who harmed them. This is because court action was commenced and a s.37 report ordered, which means the matter of who may safely care for the child has been subject to court action. That removes our legal power to investigate this matter.

The complaint

  1. Ms X said the Council had failed to safeguard her child by abandoning its plans to seek a court order to remove the child from their father. She said her child has since come to harm.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended).
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The complaint correspondence refers to court action being started that led to a request for a s.37 report due in early 2024. There is no doubt the issue likely to have been before the court, as at the heart of this complaint, is the fitness of parents to care for a child. Only a court could decide that issue in the event of a dispute. The onset of court action, even if discontinued or abandoned, removes our legal power to consider the Council’s decision that the child’s father should retain care. That remains the case even if the child has since come to harm .

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Ms X’s complaint because the matters complained of are directly connected to matters of the fitness to parent, which have been subject to court action.
  2. Ms X also has a right to return to court it would be reasonable to use as only a court could deliver the outcome she is seeking.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings