Suffolk County Council (23 018 587)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Apr 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about data matters. This is because this complaint is best considered by the Information Commissioner’s Office.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mr X, complains the Council committed a data breach when it shared his personal information with a third party. Also, that it included his personal information in an assessment report relating to his partner’s children.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  3. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council that it committed a data breach when it shared his personal information with a third party who has further shared the information with others. Mr X also complains the Council included his personal information in a social worker’s assessment report for his partner’s children.
  2. The Council says it is satisfied the information sharing was necessary, proportionate and justified as part of its safeguarding duties. It signposted Mr X to both this office and the Information Commissioner’s Office should he remain dissatisfied with its response.
  3. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because the complaint is about data matters which are best considered by the Information Commissioner’s Office, which is the body set up to consider complaints about data matters.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is about data issues which are best considered by the Information Commissioner’s Office.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings