Birmingham City Council (23 016 946)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s actions in its child protection involvement with her child because it lies outside our jurisdiction. The law prevents us from investigating complaints about matters that have been considered in court proceedings. We have no discretion to do so.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Miss X, complains about the Council’s child protection actions in relation to her child. Miss X says the Council’s involvement was unnecessary and unwanted. She says the Council lied and provided false information to the court. As a result, her child has been removed from her care and placed with her father who she says is a known risk.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint because it lies outside our jurisdiction. The law prevents us from investigating complaints about matters that have been subject to court proceedings. We have no discretion to do so. This restriction also applies to evidence and reports which have been produced and submitted to the court during proceedings.
  2. Any dissatisfaction with the court’s decision would need to be returned to the court. We cannot consider, question or change the court’s decisions.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint because it lies outside our jurisdiction and we have no discretion to consider it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings