Kent County Council (22 015 354)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Mar 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint. This is because an investigation by this office could not add to the response the Council has already provided which explains the ongoing court proceedings need to conclude before it can consider her complaint via its complaints procedure.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Ms X, complains about the Council’s actions in relation to her and her young child who is currently in foster care.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We do not start an investigation if we decide we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))
  3. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  4. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained to the Council about its actions in relation to her and her young child who is currently in foster care. The case is subject to ongoing court proceedings.
  2. The Council informed Ms X it cannot consider her complaint at this time. This is because it could be prejudicial to the ongoing court proceedings to do so. It advised Ms X to raise her concerns with her legal representative. It has informed Ms X she can resubmit her complaint once the court proceedings have concluded.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint. This is because there is nothing further an investigation by this office could add to the Council’s response explaining that in order not to prejudice the ongoing court proceedings it cannot consider her complaint until the proceedings have concluded. There is no sign of fault in this approach.
  2. If Ms X remains dissatisfied with the Council’s final response to her substantive complaint, once it has considered it, then we can assess it to see if it is a matter we can and should investigate. However, there may be matters we cannot consider as the law prevents us from considering complaints about matters that are being, or have been, considered in court. We have no discretion to do so.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings