Bracknell Forest Council (22 014 294)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Feb 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the actions of a social worker. This is because those actions relate to matters which have been decided in a court.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Miss X, complains that the Council failed to complete relevant and robust safeguarding checks when considering her daughter’s welfare.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  2. The courts have said we can decide not to investigate a complaint about any action by a council concerning a matter which is outside our jurisdiction. (R (on the application of M) v Commissioner for Local Administration [2006] EHWCC 2847 (Admin))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X’s daughter is the subject of private legal proceedings. In the course of the proceedings, the Court directed the Council to carry out a risk assessment relating to the issue of contact between Miss X’s daughter and her father. The evidence shows that the Council did so in the context of a child and family assessment, after which the risk assessment was presented to the Court.
  2. Miss X complains about the conduct of the social worker during the assessment and about the conclusions she reached. In her view, the social worker was biased towards her daughter’s father and failed to properly consider her daughter’s welfare. She further complains that the social worker encouraged her daughter’s father to breach a court order.
  3. The Ombudsman cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint because it concerns matters which have been decided in court. The law prevents us from considering evidence presented to a court and how this evidence was produced. The fact that the assessment the social worker produced was material to the legal proceedings places its content, and how it was produced, outside our jurisdiction.
  4. If Miss X believes a court order was breached, her recourse is to take the matter back to court. There is no role for the Ombudsman.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint because it concerns matters which have been decided in court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings