London Borough of Lewisham (22 012 636)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Jan 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about matters relating to the Council’s child protection involvement with her family. This is because an investigation by this office could not add to the response the Council has already provided explaining the ongoing family court proceedings need to conclude before it can consider her complaint.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mrs X, complains about matters relating to the Council’s child protection involvement with her family and reports submitted to the court.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We do not start an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained to the Council about matters relating to its child protection involvement with her family.
  2. The Council told Mrs X it is unable to consider her complaint via its complaints procedure at this time due to ongoing family court proceedings. It told Mrs X it can consider a complaint from her, about any matters not raised during the court proceedings, once the proceedings have concluded.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. This is because there is nothing further we could add to the Council’s response explaining it cannot consider her substantive complaint until the court proceedings have concluded. There is no sign of fault in this approach. This is to ensure the complaints process does not prejudice the court proceedings in any way.
  2. Mrs X can remake her complaint to the Council once the court proceedings have ended. If she remains dissatisfied with the Council’s final response to her complaint then we can assess it to see if it is a matter we can and should consider. However, the law prevents us from considering complaints about matters that are being, or have been, considered in court. We have no discretion to do so.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings