Kent County Council (22 009 063)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Nov 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council accepting what two children said and not checking Mrs X’s mobile phone. The matters complained of are not separable from that of contact with the children. Only a court can mandate contact, and we cannot achieve the outcome Mrs X is seeking.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X said the Council wrongly failed to check her mobile phone for calls. She said this would prove the date of a call given by her grandchildren was wrong. She said the false information had led to the children’s father cutting contact.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))
  2. We have the power to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been, raised within a court of law. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X is the maternal grandmother of two children, who live with their father. She is understandably distressed that she is currently unable to see her grandchildren. However, her aim is essentially for the Council to intervene to promote contact by vindicating what she has said to the children’s father.
  2. Contact with children is decided by a court. Were we to recommend the Council does what Mrs X wants in confirming the date of a call, we would be making a recommendation that is inextricably linked to the issue of contact, which is at the heart of Mrs X’s complaint. We could not do that without in effect seeking to assist her in restoring contact.
  3. I realise that it is not easy or straightforward for a grandparent to restore contact with a grandchild via a court. However, as contact arrangements for children can only be changed by a court, it would be reasonable to follow that process.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because we cannot achieve the outcome she is seeking, which is not separable from matters that can only be decided by a court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings