Manchester City Council (22 002 253)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 May 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to a referral received by children’s services. This is because there is insufficient injustice to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Miss B, complains that the Council began an assessment of her family and visited her home against her wishes. She further complains that it was at fault in threatening her with formal child protection action.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss B’s complaint relates to the Council’s response to a referral it received following a visit she and her son made to hospital. Miss B says the Council contacted her about the matter and she explicitly declined its intervention.
  2. Miss B says that, despite her expressed wishes, the Council threatened her with a Section 47 investigation, and two of its officers carried out an unannounced home visit. She complains that the officers were clearly identifiable as social workers to her neighbours.
  3. In its response to Miss B’s complaint, the Council denied it threatened Section 47 action, and said its officers were as discreet as possible when they visited her home. However, it did accept that it had been at fault in how it had communicated and apologised for this. Miss B regards this as insufficient and wants financial compensation.
  4. We will not investigate Miss B’s complaint because there is insufficient outstanding injustice to warrant our intervention. While there is no doubt the events were distressing for her, I note that the Council quickly clarified that it intended to take no action and issued a closure letter. The Council’s apology is sufficient in the circumstances of the case.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss B’s complaint because there is insufficient injustice to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings