Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Essex County Council (21 018 638)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Apr 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Mr X not being allowed to return to the family home. There is not enough evidence of fault to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council will not allow him to return to the family home where he previously lived with his wife Mrs X and her child.
  2. Mr X further complains the Council have caused emotional distress, financial difficulty and discriminated against him.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended).
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X has a criminal conviction which the Council has considered when deciding if he should be allowed to return to the family home with Mrs X and her child.
  2. The Council have taken the decision that the nature of Mr X’s conviction means he may pose a risk to children. It is entitled to reach this view.
  3. Mr X is entitled to move back into the family home with Mrs X and deal with any consequences that may arise.
  4. Mr X and Mrs X also have the right to go to court to seek a child arrangements order which would determine who may live with and spend time with Mrs X’s child.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation of their decision in relation to allowing him to return to the family home. Mr X also has the right to go to court for a child arrangements order. It would be reasonable to expect him to use this right.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page