Wakefield City Council (21 017 845)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Apr 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about his allegation that children services officers forced him to leave the family home for two days. It is unlikely we could achieve more than the service improvement the Council has already made.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mr X, says the Council’s children services team treated him unfairly which meant he had to leave the family home.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
    • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
    • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says the Council’s children services team investigated a safeguarding referral made by a neighbour. This was an allegation that he had harmed his partner’s children to whom he does not have parental responsibility. Mr X says the officers told him he had to leave the family home. He says he was homeless for two days.
  2. The Council in reply to this complaint explained that it had no power to force Mr X to leave the home. It says its officers understanding of the conversation which led to Mr X leaving the home is different to his. It said as a result of Mr X’s complaint, there will be discussions with the social work team around ensuring safety planning is clearly understood by all parties.
  3. It is unlikely our investigation could achieve more than this. Mr X says there should be better information sharing. Mr X has no legal right to see any information about the children concerned.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is unlikely we could achieve more than the service improvement already made.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings