Bedford Borough Council (21 000 928)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Jul 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint about issues which are part of or closely related to continuing Court proceedings. Another body is better placed to consider her data protection complaints.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Miss X, complains about the actions of the Council’s children services team.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  3. We have the power to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been, raised within a court of law. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I considered Miss X’s comments on a draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X complains about various children services actions. This includes the failure to help and support her; the content of documents; providing information to third parties and the contact she has with her child.
  2. The Council says it has had a child protection plan for Miss X’s child since November 2020. It has since started court Care Proceedings. This means it has asked the Court to decide the child’s care arrangements. The Council says those proceedings are continuing.
  3. The Council replied to a complaint from Miss X earlier this year. It says it will not progress this complaint while the Court proceedings continue as it did not want to risk prejudicing those proceedings.
  4. We cannot investigate the same issues a Court is considering. This means we could not investigate issues closely related to the child’s care. This includes the support to Miss X, her contact with her child and the views it holds about her.
  5. Parliament set up the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) to consider data protection disputes. This includes whether Miss X is entitled to have documents she seeks and whether the Council wrongly gave information to third parties without her consent. The ICO is better placed than us to consider these complaints.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not and cannot investigate this complaint. This is because we cannot investigate issues which are part of legal proceedings and the ICO is better placed to consider her data protection complaints.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings