London Borough of Redbridge (20 014 244)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Not upheld

Decision date : 04 Oct 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Ms X complains about the Council’s actions following her disclosure of abuse to her school more than ten years ago. We propose to discontinue the investigation as we do not feel we will be able to reach a meaningful conclusion.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to here as Ms X, made a disclosure to her school in 2010 concerning abuse that had occurred some years previously. Ms X complains that the Council offered her insufficient support and failed to follow correct procedures. She says she has suffered mental trauma as a result and seeks compensation to fund private therapy for this.

Back to top

What I have investigated

  1. I have decided to discontinue my investigation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. If there has been fault which has caused an injustice, we may suggest a remedy. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(1) and 26A(1), as amended)
  2. If we are satisfied with a council’s actions or proposed actions, we can complete our investigation and issue a decision statement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 30(1B) and 34H(i), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I spoke to Ms X and considered information provided by herself and by the Council. I have shared this draft statement with her and with the Council and will consider any comments they choose to make before finalising my decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. In 2010 Ms X told her school that she had suffered sexual abuse several years earlier. The school reported the matter to the police, who interviewed the suspect and released him without charge.
  2. Ms X says the Council closed the matter down too quickly and did not follow the correct safeguarding procedures. She states that it also failed to arrange for her to receive a medical examination and appropriate tests and failed to offer her support. She says that the Council’s faults have caused her serious mental health issues. She seeks compensation in the form of funding for private therapy.

Back to top

Analysis

  1. I am not confident of being able to reach a fair or meaningful decision on this complaint given the time that has passed since the Council’s actions. There is likely to be limited evidence available and we are not trained or resourced to investigate historic matters.
  2. Standards and procedures governing councils’ responses to abuse allegations have also changed in the last decade. I would therefore have difficulty deciding whether there was maladministration. I have decided to discontinue the investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I have decided to discontinue my investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings