Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 52233 results

  • Essex County Council (24 001 603)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 10-Sep-2024

    Summary: The Council was at fault because it failed to ensure Y received speech and language therapy in line with his Education, Health and Care Plan. This caused a loss of special educational provision, avoidable distress and time and trouble complaining. The Council will apologise and make payments of £100 and £200.

  • London Borough of Bexley (24 005 613)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 10-Sep-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about delays in the review of her child, Y’s, Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan. This is because the complaint is late. In addition, Miss X had a right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal about the content of the EHC Plan. The Council also apologised for poor communication.

  • Suffolk County Council (24 005 626)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Fostering 10-Sep-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an alleged data breach. The Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to deal with this complaint as it has powers we lack to determine if there has been a data breach and to impose penalties.

  • Milton Keynes Council (24 005 781)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 10-Sep-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to respond to complaints Mr X has made. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council sufficient to warrant an investigation.

  • West Northamptonshire Council (23 017 013)

    Statement Upheld Charging 10-Sep-2024

    Summary: Mr C complains the Council provided inaccurate charging information for residential care, and wrongly refused an application for a deferred payment agreement. The Council is at fault for failing to properly advise Mr C of charges and payments it was willing to make. This caused him stress, time, and trouble. To put things right the Council has agreed to apologise to Mr C, make him a symbolic payment, and make service improvements.

  • Gloucestershire County Council (24 006 174)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway repair and maintenance 10-Sep-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to carry out maintenance to a bridleway which has private vehicle access rights. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

  • Derbyshire County Council (24 006 227)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Rights of way 10-Sep-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a right of way because it is late without good reason to exercise discretion to investigate it now.

  • Cheltenham Borough Council (24 006 293)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 10-Sep-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s planning processes and decisions on applications for a development site next to her property. The complaint is late and there are no good reasons for us to investigate it now.

  • Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (24 006 391)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 10-Sep-2024

    Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about evidence a social worker provided to the court in family court proceedings because it lies outside our jurisdiction. The law prevents us from investigating complaints about matters that are being, or have been, considered in court proceedings. We have no discretion to do so.

  • Medway Council (24 006 394)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 10-Sep-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a penalty charge notice. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council and it would have been reasonable for Mr X to appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings