Cherwell District Council (25 018 210)

Category : Benefits and tax > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council responded to questions about Business Rates. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained the Council misled her about the amount of Business Rates due at a community hub. She said the Council would not share results of its investigation with her. Ms X said irregularities in Business Rates have caused her concern. She would like the Council to share the results of their complaints investigation and be open about Business Rates arrangements.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X said the Council misled her about business rates at a proposed community hub. She said she was told the Council did not pay business rates on vacant properties.
  2. In its complaint response, the Council said there had been a misunderstanding over business rates liability. It clarified that it was possible for the Council to not pay business rates on empty units due to the application of certain exemptions, while liability for the unit still existed.
  3. The Council said the information shared with Ms X was correct, but recognised the distinction between liability arising and whether the Council pays business rates on individual units was not explained clearly enough in conversations with Ms X. The Council also apologised for its delayed complaint response.
  4. We will not investigate this complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. The Council clarified its approach to business rates for empty units. It investigated Ms X’s complaint and shared the results of its investigation within its two complaint responses, including its conclusion that information shared with Ms X was accurate.
  5. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we decide not to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings