London Borough of Lambeth (25 001 218)

Category : Benefits and tax > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 May 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a delay in Business rates liability because it relates to a body out of jurisdiction and there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains that the Valuation Office Agency has unreasonably delayed determining a request to separate business rates liability.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about councils and certain other bodies. We cannot investigate the actions of bodies such as the Valuation Office Agency. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 25 and 34(1), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X says that she applied to the Valuation Office Agency in March 2024 to separate her Business rates property into two separate sublets. There was delay due to an initial error by the complainant and the Council agreed and passed on her request to the Valuation Office Agency in October 2024.
  2. No decision has been made by the Valuation Office Agency yet and so the Council issued a summons for non payment of Business rates in March 2025 as no payment had been received.
  3. Any dispute about non payment of Business rates is a matter for the court. The Council’s decision to pursue arrears until any decision has been made by the Valuation Office Agency is not fault.
  4. The alleged delay is against the Valuation Office Agency which is a body out of jurisdiction. There is no evidence of fault by the Council in passing the request to the Valuation Office Agency.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it is against a body out of jurisdiction and there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings