Westminster City Council (22 016 352)

Category : Benefits and tax > Other

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 21 Mar 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a late Business rates bill because the matter has been remedied.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains that the Council sent a late Business Rates bill to her client despite the Council’s Planning Department being aware of their presence in the building and their likely liability.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We have the power to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been, raised within a court of law. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X says that her client was not billed for Business Rates to two years after their liability started despite the Council’s planning department being aware of their presence.
  2. The Council says that it does not share information from Planning to Business Rates and that her client must have been aware that a liability for rates existed.
  3. Ms X does not deny liability but she says her client believed that covid measures meant that no business rates were levied during the period. She says her client was unable to budget for the rates as a result.
  4. Whilst there is no legal obligation on a person liable for Business rates to notify the Council of their presence, I am satisfied that Ms X’s client would have been aware that some liability existed, notwithstanding covid measures. I do not consider it reasonable to assume no liability existed because the Council did not respond after the Planning Department became aware of their presence.
  5. The Council has agreed time to pay off the arrears and I consider this a reasonable settlement to the complaint. Any dispute about liability or the amount of the bill is a matter for the courts.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings