Mendip District Council (22 003 595)

Category : Benefits and tax > Other

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 29 Jun 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council wrongly pursuing Mr X for council tax he did not owe. This is because the Council has proposed a suitable remedy and any remaining injustice to Mr X is not sufficient to warrant our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council wrongly pursued him for a council tax debt. Mr X had to spend several hours contacting the Council to try to resolve this, including making six telephone calls. Mr X also wrongly received two letters from the Council’s enforcement agents. This has caused Mr X distress and worry, which affected his sleep and relationships.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions a council has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has explained to Mr X that this problem arose due to human error and that it has taken steps to avoid this happening again in future. It acknowledged Mr X has been caused distress by its fault and it has apologised to him for this. It has also offered Mr X a payment of £200 in recognition of the impact this matter has had on him.
  2. While I recognise Mr X remains upset at what took place, I consider that the Council has provided a reasonable remedy to this complaint and one that is broadly in line with our remedies’ guidance. As such, I do not consider there is sufficient remaining injustice caused to Mr X to warrant our further involvement or that this would be in the public interest. We will not therefore investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the Council has provided a suitable remedy to the complaint and our further involvement is therefore not warranted.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings