Bedford Borough Council (21 009 130)

Category : Benefits and tax > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 02 Nov 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Ms X complains about the Council’s use of bailiffs to enforce a debt. We will not investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains about the Council’s use of bailiffs to enforce a debt.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I considered the complainant’s comments on my draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X says that, following the appointment of bailiffs to enforce a council tax debt, she made an agreement to pay the arrears. However, she accepts that she missed a payment of 20 pounds. The bailiffs (acting on behalf of the Council) say that this meant the whole arrears became payable.
  2. The Bailiffs say that a compliance letter had been sent after the Liability Order had been obtained. As the agreement had been breached, a bailiff visited Ms X. Ms X says that she did not receive the letter telling her that a visit was to be made. She says that the bailiff failed to comply with social distancing when she came out of her house.
  3. The bailiffs say that the bailiff’s bodycam confirms that the bailiff acted properly and with social distancing.
  4. The letter advising Ms X of the visit was computer generated (according to the bailiffs). The Ombudsman would not be able to say with certainty whether or not the letter was either sent or not received. However, as the agreement had been breached the bailiffs were entitled to visit to enforce the debt. The visit charge would therefore be applicable. I am satisfied therefore that the significant effect upon Ms X (the enforcement charge of 235 pounds) was made without administrative fault.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings