Manchester City Council (19 008 158)

Category : Benefits and tax > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Oct 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s enforcement action to recover unpaid business rates in July 2017. This is because the complaint is late and it is unlikely we could effectively investigate the matter now.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council’s enforcement agents forced him to pay business rates owed by a third party in July 2017.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I reviewed Mr X’s complaint and the Council’s response. I shared my draft decision with Mr X's representative, Mr Y, and invited his comments.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X is not a native English speaker. He complains the Council’s enforcement agents collected almost £55,000 from him in July 2017 for unpaid business rates owed by a third party. He says he did not understand what was going on and paid under duress. He suggests the enforcement agent knew he was not liable for the debt but took the money anyway.
  2. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. The actions Mr X complains about date back to July 2017 and Mr X did not bring his complaint to us until August 2019; the complaint is therefore more than a year late.
  3. While the Ombudsman has discretion to investigate late complaints I have seen no good reasons to exercise our discretion in this case. Mr X is a business-owner and should be aware of business rates; he also did not have to pay the amount demanded if he did not believe he was liable for it.
  4. It is also unlikely we could effectively investigate this matter so long after the event. The Council has confirmed there is no video evidence available and that the agent is no longer employed by the company; it is therefore unlikely we could get to the bottom of what happened or say, on balance, that there was fault in the way the enforcement agent dealt with the matter on the Council’s behalf.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because the complaint is late and it is unlikely we could effectively investigate the matter now.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings