London Borough of Tower Hamlets (26 011 471)

Category : Benefits and tax > Local welfare payments

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the information the Council provided in response to a request by us. It is unlikely we would find fault in the Council’s actions.

The complaint

  1. X complained the Council provided incorrect information in response to an enquiry request, we made about an earlier complaint X had registered with us. X said the Council’s actions meant they had their complaint closed on incorrect information and had to go to time and trouble to challenge our decision.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating and there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. X said the Council was at fault, because they believed it provided incorrect information to us, in response to an earlier complaint she had registered with us, that we were considering. They said because of this incorrect information, we decided we could not investigate their complaint because it was outside of our jurisdiction.
  2. We had told X, in a separate letter, when we overturned our earlier decision, that the examination of the information the Council provided to us, was our responsibility and we had wrongly interpreted they had started court proceedings.
  3. In the context of X’s new complaint made to us now, and having once again considered the information the Council provided to us for that earlier complaint, including copies of correspondence between the Council and X, the information it had provided was in line with our request. It is therefore unlikely we would find fault in the Council’s actions in complying with what we asked for, and I will not investigate X’s complaint.
  4. X was unhappy the Council declined to consider a complaint about this matter. The evidence shows it signposted X to us. I will not investigate a complaint about complaint handling about this matter, because there is no worthwhile outcome achievable and it is not a good use of public money.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate X’s complaint because it is unlikely we would find fault in the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings