London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham (25 017 042)

Category : Benefits and tax > Local welfare payments

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to decline his application for a Local Support Payment. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council refused his application to its Local Support Scheme for a replacement fridge freezer. He says he made several applications and the Council’s responses were inconsistent.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X applied to the Council’s Local Support Scheme for a new fridge freezer after his broke down. He says it was the height of summer, and he lost all his food. He also says he stored essential medicine in the fridge. He said the Council failed to consider his personal circumstances.
  2. The Council explained the scheme is discretionary and it did not consider Mr X’s circumstances met the criteria for the scheme. It said the Local Support Scheme is designed for disaster or resettlement rather than replacing an item it has already funded. The Council recognised Mr X’s disability and personal circumstances and suggested applying to another scheme.
  3. The Council declined Mr X’s application several times. It agreed with Mr X that its responses had been inconsistent. It said it would introduce a standardised response letter for consistency.
  4. The Council has explained why it has declined the application and set out the criteria for the decision. It is entitled to make this decision. Based on the evidence I have seen, there is no evidence of fault in its actions.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings