Birmingham City Council (26 012 461)

Category : Benefits and tax > Housing benefit and council tax benefit

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a housing benefit overpayment. It is reasonable to expect Mr X to use the alternative remedy available to him and appeal to the independent benefits tribunal (the First-Tier Tribunal).

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council has started to deduct a housing benefit overpayment from him. Mr X disputes the overpayment.
  2. Mr X said this caused distress.
  3. Mr X wants the Council to cancel the debt and reimburse him for the amount he has already paid.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We consider our powers on what we could achieve as part of our consideration of whether an alternative remedy exists and whether it is reasonable for a person to use it.
  2. If someone disagrees with a decision about an overpayment they can appeal to the tribunal. The law says people should appeal within one month of the date of the decision they think is wrong. The tribunal can accept a late appeal up to 13 months from the date of the decision. Because the person can appeal, we would normally decide not to investigate complaints about these decisions.
  3. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. As we cannot direct the Council to cancel the debt nor repay monies he has already paid, it is reasonable for Mr X to appeal to the independent benefits tribunal (the First-Tier Tribunal).

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable for him to appeal to the independent benefits tribunal (the First-Tier Tribunal).

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings