London Borough of Lambeth (25 028 812)

Category : Benefits and tax > Housing benefit and council tax benefit

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a housing benefit transitional payment. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council has not paid a transitional run on housing benefit payment to his rent account. The Council says it offset the transitional payment because it had already paid Mr X housing benefit for the same two week period in January 2025.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council regarding the matters in paragraph 1.
  2. The Council replied it agreed Mr X was entitled to the two week run on payment. However, it said it had already paid housing benefit for the same period to which Mr X was not entitled. It had overpaid Mr X two weeks. The Council said it that it must by law offset any new entitlement against an outstanding overpayment. It had offset the run on payment against the housing benefit overpayment. This meant no further payment was made.
  3. The Council noted Mr X complained further the Council had double counted and had not paid anything for the two week period. Mr X said he now had a two week shortfall in his account. However it did not uphold his complaint. It confirmed that it had awarded the two week run on but this was offset against the housing benefit overpayment.
  4. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council. Its records show it applied the two week run, on but this was offset against an overpayment of housing benefit that it had already paid. Therefore, no further payment was sent to Mr X’s account.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings