London Borough of Haringey (25 004 433)

Category : Benefits and tax > Housing benefit and council tax benefit

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an unsuccessful application for a Discretionary Housing Payment. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, disagrees with the Council’s decision to reject his application for a Discretionary Housing Payment (DHP).

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council. This includes the DHP application and the supporting evidence. I also considered the DHP policy and our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Councils can award a DHP if someone has a shortfall between their rent and the amount of benefit support they receive for housing costs. DHPs are discretionary and councils do not have to make an award. The policy says DHPs cannot be awarded to cover a reduction in benefit.
  2. Mr X receives Universal Credit (UC). His rent is £148 a week and he receives UC housing costs of £148 a week. The UC is reduced because Mr X is repaying a UC advance payment. The reduction will stop once Mr X has repaid the advance payment.
  3. Mr X applied for a DHP because he has rent arrears. The Council rejected his application because all his rent is covered by the UC.
  4. I will not start an investigation because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. This is because the Council’s decision reflects the policy. Specifically, there is no shortfall between the UC and the rent, and a DHP cannot be used to cover deductions to recover an advance payment.
  5. I appreciate Mr X disagrees with the decision. But, we are not an appeal body and we cannot intervene simply because a council makes a decision that someone disagrees with.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings