Leeds City Council (24 019 507)

Category : Benefits and tax > Housing benefit and council tax benefit

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a housing benefit overpayment because the complainants could have appealed to the tribunal.

The complaint

  1. The complainants, Mr & Mrs X, complain about a housing benefit overpayment. They say they cannot afford to repay the overpayment in a lump sum and the Council has not replied to their letters or emails.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The Social Entitlement Chamber (also known as the Social Security Appeal Tribunal) is a tribunal that considers housing benefit appeals. (The Social Entitlement Chamber of the First Tier Tribunal)
  4. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction. This includes appeals about overpayments.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainants and the Council. This includes correspondence about the overpayment and the decision letters. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council asked Mr & Mrs X to repay a housing benefit overpayment after it found out Mr X had a pension he had not disclosed. The pension affected Mr & Mrs X’s entitlement to housing benefit and council tax support and created overpayments. The Council asked Mr & Mrs X to repay the overpayments.
  2. Following correspondence from Mr & Mrs X the Council revised the amount of the overpayment and notified them of their appeal rights. An officer spoke with Mr X to explain the overpayment. The Council told me Mr & Mrs X have not asked to repay the money in instalments.
  3. I will not start an investigation because Mr & Mrs X could have appealed to the tribunal if they dispute they should have to repay the overpayment or disagree with the amount. It is reasonable to expect them to appeal because the tribunal is the correct organisation to consider benefit appeals and the Council notified Mr & Mrs X of their appeal rights. It is not our role to decide if the overpayment is correct or say whether it is recoverable.
  4. Mr & Mrs X say the Council has not responded but I have seen correspondence between both parties and there have been calls.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because the complainants could have appealed to the tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings