Slough Borough Council (23 020 898)

Category : Benefits and tax > Housing benefit and council tax benefit

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an alledged failing by the Council to refer housing benefit appeals to the independent benefits tribunal. This is because the Council has confirmed the matters raised will be subject to appeals by the tribunal. On this basis, further investigation would not lead to a different achieve outcome.

The complaint

  1. The complainant (Miss X) complains about the Council decision that she was overpaid housing benefit between 2008 and 2017 due to alledged fraud. She says the Council has failed to refer her appeal of the decision to the independent benefits tribunal (the First-Tier Tribunal).
  2. In summary, Miss X says the alledged fault has caused her financial hardship and has had a significant and adverse effect on her wellbeing. As a desired outcome, Miss X wants the Council to refer her appeals to the First-Tier Tribunal.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the complainant, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)).
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended).
  3. The Social Entitlement Chamber (also known as the Social Security Appeal Tribunal) is a tribunal that considers housing benefit appeals. (The Social Entitlement Chamber of the First Tier Tribunal).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has confirmed it has put on hold recovery of the alledged overpayments of housing benefit made to Miss X pending the outcome of the appeals. It has confirmed the matters raised will therefore be subject to appeals in the First Tier Tribunal. On this basis, further investigation would not lead to a different achieve outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the restriction I outline at paragraph three (above) applies.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings