Oxford City Council (22 016 877)

Category : Benefits and tax > Housing benefit and council tax benefit

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Mar 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council calculated Mr X’s housing benefit entitlement. It is reasonable for Mr X to use his right of appeal to tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council miscalculated his housing benefit. He says it did not respond to his attempts to contact it about the matter. He says this left him with over £1,000 underpayments and he has gone to significant time and trouble in looking into what he believes are systemic errors affecting many people. He wants the Council to make service improvements.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s calculation of his housing benefit over three years. The Council has recently amended a decision and is paying some underpaid housing benefit back to Mr X. However, he says there remain several errors, including a decision that he has been overpaid for one period.
  2. If someone disagrees with a housing benefit decision they can ask the Council to review its decision. If they have a review, and are unhappy with the decision, they can then appeal to the independent benefits tribunal (the First-Tier Tribunal) administered by the Ministry of Justice, through its HM Courts and Tribunal Service.
  3. Because of this opportunity for appeal, we would not normally investigate complaints about this type of decision. The tribunal is an independent expert body whose decisions are binding on the Council. It would be reasonable to make an appeal to the tribunal in this case. This also applies to the other people Mr X says are affected by errors, and there is not an overriding public interest reason for us to investigate this instead of individuals using their right of appeal.
  4. The law says people should appeal within one month of the date of the decision they think is wrong. The tribunal can accept a late appeal up to 13 months from the date of the decision. Some periods Mr X complains about may now be out of time. However, it is open to Mr X to ask the Council to refer his case to the tribunal, for a Tribunal Service Judge to decide whether to accept a late appeal.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable for him to use his right of appeal to tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings