London Borough of Croydon (19 018 280)

Category : Benefits and tax > Housing benefit and council tax benefit

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Mar 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a reduction in his housing benefit. This is because if Mr X wants to challenge the Council’s decision it is reasonable for him to appeal to the tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about a reduction is his housing benefit.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The Social Entitlement Chamber (also known as the Social Security Appeal Tribunal) is a tribunal that considers housing benefit appeals. (The Social Entitlement Chamber of the First Tier Tribunal)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered Mr X’s complaint to the Ombudsman and the information he provided. I gave Mr X the opportunity to comment on a draft statement before reaching a final decision on his complaint.

Back to top

What I found

  1. The Council has reduced Mr X’s housing benefit since his mother came to live with him. Mr X says he has sent the Council information it has asked for, but he disagrees with its decision.
  2. The role of the Ombudsman is to look for administrative fault. We are not a right of appeal for people who disagree with a council’s decision about their housing benefit. Decisions about entitlement to housing benefit can be appealed to the tribunal I refer to in paragraph 3. The tribunal is an independent, expert body, set up by Parliament, as a way for the public to challenge decisions about housing benefit. When there is a right to appeal to a tribunal, the Ombudsman normally expects people to use this right, unless it is unreasonable for them to do so. I see no reason Mr X should not appeal to the tribunal. It can decide if the Council has acted appropriately and if Mr X’s is receiving the housing benefit he is entitled to.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because it is reasonable for Mr X to appeal to the tribunal.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings