Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council (19 003 765)

Category : Benefits and tax > Housing benefit and council tax benefit

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Aug 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to end the complainant’s housing benefit and council tax reduction. This is because the Council is currently reviewing the case and the complainant will be able to appeal to the tribunal.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Mr X, disagrees with the Council’s decision to end his housing benefit and council tax reduction. Mr X wants the Council to award benefit for March and April.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The Social Entitlement Chamber (also known as the Social Security Appeal Tribunal) is a tribunal that considers housing benefit appeals. (The Social Entitlement Chamber of the First Tier Tribunal)
  4. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax reduction.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I read the complaint and found out that the Council is reviewing the decisions. I invited Mr X to comment on a draft of this decision.

Back to top

What I found

Benefit decisions

  1. If someone disagrees with a benefit decision they can ask for a review or appeal to the tribunal. If they have a review, and are unhappy with the decision, they can appeal to the tribunal.

What happened

  1. Mr X was getting housing benefit and council tax reduction. He felt his accommodation was not suitable so in March he went to stay with a friend. Initially he intended this to be a temporary visit but he has decided not to return.
  2. The Council cancelled Mr X’s benefits from the date he went away. Mr X disagrees with the decision and says he is entitled to benefit for the first 13 weeks of the absence.
  3. The Council is currently reviewing the benefit decisions. If Mr X disagrees with the review decisions he can appeal to the tribunal.

Assessment

  1. I will not start an investigation because the Council is currently reviewing the decisions and, if Mr X disagrees with the review decisions, he can appeal to the tribunal. It is reasonable to expect Mr X to appeal because the tribunal is the appropriate body to consider benefit appeals. In addition, the tribunal is free to use. The Ombudsman does not make benefit decisions; that is the role of the Council and the tribunal.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I will not start an investigation because the Council is reviewing the case and Mr X will be able to appeal to the tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings