North Norfolk District Council (21 013 100)

Category : Benefits and tax > COVID-19

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse her application for a COVID-19 small business grant. This is because the complaint is late and I have seen no good reasons to exercise our discretion to investigate it.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mrs X, complains about the Council’s decision to refuse her application for a small business grant in May 2020.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

Background

  1. Mrs X applied for a small business grant from the Council, as her business was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, in April 2020. She disputes the Council’s decision to refuse her application and says the Council has misunderstood and misinterpreted evidence regarding occupation of her business premises.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council refused Mrs X’s application on 6 May 2020 but Mrs X did not complain to us until 1 December 2021. Her complaint is therefore late.
  2. I have considered Mrs X’s comments about the way the Council handled her challenge to its decision and delayed in providing a formal complaint response but I do not consider these provide good reasons to exercise our discretion to disapply our time limit. This is because the Council issued its final response on 9 June 2021 and the response referred her to us and clearly set out our time limit.
  3. The Council’s letter also clarified that our time limit started from the date of the actions complained about and not the date of its final response. Mrs X was therefore aware that her complaint was already technically outside our time limit but then waited a further six months to bring the matter to us. In the circumstances I consider it would have been reasonable for Mrs X to complain to us sooner and see no good reasons to exercise our discretion to investigate the complaint now.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the complaint is late and I have seen no good reasons to exercise our discretion to investigate it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings