Durham County Council (26 016 822)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council applying two separate 100% premium charges to the council tax bill for Mr X’s property. This is because he had the right of appeal to the Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council applied two separate 100% premium charges to the council tax bill for his property. He says both charges were applied incorrectly. He also says the Council altered his details. Mr X says this has caused him worry and time and trouble. He wants charges refunded to him, answers to his questions and for the Council to explain why it falsified his details.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council says Mr X was liable for council tax as the owner of the property during 2024 and 2025. Although Mr X says the property was occupied, the Council says the occupiers confirmed it was not their main residence until December 2025. It therefore treated the property as a second home and applied a 100% council tax premium.
  2. Mr X can appeal to the Valuation Tribunal if he disputes the Council’s application of the premium. The Tribunal is an independent body with the power to decide disputes about council tax liability and premiums. I see no reason why it would be unreasonable to expect Mr X to use this appeal right. We will therefore not investigate this part of his complaint.
  3. The Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to consider Mr X’s concerns that the Council falsified or recorded inaccurate information. It has powers to obtain information, require inaccurate personal data to be corrected and take enforcement action which the Ombudsman does not have. We will therefore not investigate this part of the complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he could have appealed to the Valuation Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings