Council tax


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council (19 021 022)

    Statement Upheld Council tax 11-May-2021

    Summary: Ms X complained that the Council should not have passed a council tax debt to bailiffs and they did not acknowledge her vulnerability. She also complained the amount of council tax she was charged was too high. We found the Council should have referred her case to its welfare team to assess if her account should be with bailiffs. In the course of the investigation the Council provided inaccurate information about the bailiff fees that had been applied. It also stated the fees had been withdrawn. This was not the case, only some of the fees were withdrawn. We recommended a payment to Ms X to refund the remaining fees she paid and to recognise the time and trouble she was put to pursuing her complaint. However, we found no fault with the way officers dealt with Ms X or with the way council tax deductions were applied.

  • Cheshire East Council (20 007 093)

    Statement Not upheld Council tax 05-May-2021

    Summary: Mr B complains the Council has not paid him a full council tax refund. He says the Council will only refund him half and the other half to his former partner, even though he solely paid the tax. The Ombudsman does not find fault in how the Council processed the refund.

  • Sheffield City Council (20 013 929)

    Statement Upheld Council tax 29-Apr-2021

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Council error involving the complainant's council tax. This is because the Council has offered a fair and proportionate remedy.

  • Corby Borough Council (20 001 807)

    Statement Upheld Council tax 27-Apr-2021

    Summary: Ms X complained the Council applied Council Tax to an annex on her house despite the annex being exempt. Ms X complained the Council sent the Council Tax charges to debt collection agencies causing additional debt collection charges. The Council has admitted fault for charging Council Tax and has refunded Ms X the overpayments she made. The Ombudsman found the Council was at fault for charging council tax despite having the relevant information to know the property was exempt and the subsequent debt collection activity. The Council agreed to the Ombudsman recommendations to refunds any debt collection charges and provide Ms X with an apology and £900 for the avoidable distress, frustration and financial hardship it caused.

  • Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council (19 015 455)

    Statement Not upheld Council tax 09-Apr-2021

    Summary: Mr B complains the Council failed to treat him as a vulnerable debtor due to his disability. We do not find fault with the Council.

  • London Borough of Brent (20 003 493)

    Statement Upheld Council tax 08-Apr-2021

    Summary: Mr X complains about the way the Council sought to recover his council tax debt. He says the Council threatened him with bankruptcy. Mr X says he now has a large loan that he struggles to repay, which means he has defaulted on his mortgage and utility bills, and means he has not been able to pay this year's council tax. He says it has also had an impact on his physical and mental health. The Ombudsman finds the Council at fault for poor record keeping. However, the Ombudsman does not find the fault caused Mr X injustice. The Ombudsman does not uphold the rest of Mr X's complaint.

  • Manchester City Council (20 012 790)

    Statement Upheld Council tax 06-Apr-2021

    Summary: Mr X complains about the way the Council dealt with his wife's council tax appeal request. We will not investigate this complaint because the Council has apologised and any injustice caused is speculative.

  • Royal Borough of Greenwich (20 006 031)

    Statement Upheld Council tax 01-Apr-2021

    Summary: Mr J complains the Council is trying to enforce an old council tax debt. He says this is unfair, as he cannot now prove he cleared the debt. The Council notes there is no legal time limit on council tax debt enforcement. Our view is the Council was at fault, as it cannot demonstrate it tried to trace Mr J in the intervening years. It is not fair for the Council to now collect the debt when its own delay has prevented Mr J from being able to challenge it. The Council has accepted our recommendations to not pursue the debt. So we have completed our investigation.

  • Leicester City Council (20 004 919)

    Statement Not upheld Council tax 25-Mar-2021

    Summary: Mr X complains that the Council refused to refund money he paid to enforcement agents with respect to an alleged council tax debt. I have stopped investigating this complaint. The Council offered to refund the money and so no further action by the Ombudsman is needed.

  • London Borough of Haringey (20 002 350)

    Statement Upheld Council tax 18-Mar-2021

    Summary: Ms Y complains the Council failed to credit payments she made under a payment agreement to her arrears and current year's liability. The Council is at fault as it did not clearly explain that a payment arrangement made in January 2020 did not cover the current year's Council Tax liability. But this lack of clarity did not cause significant injustice to Ms Y.

Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.