Newark & Sherwood District Council (26 010 939)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about allocation of council tax payments. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council allocated a payment she made in April 2026 to 2025/26 when that year was paid in full or in credit. She says the Council failed to maintain accurate records and provided inconsistent and unclear information about her account and payments.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained to the Council regarding the matters in paragraph 1.
  2. The Council replied that it had allocated payments correctly. It provided a statement which showed Ms X was in arrears on 31 March 2026. The Council allocated the payment she made in April 2026 to the arrears for 2025/26. The Council also allocated part of the payment Ms X made in May 2026. This led to her being behind on her 2026/27 payments.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint because it is unlikely we would find enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation. This is because it is not fault for a Council to allocate payments to the oldest outstanding debt. The Council has shown in its statement that there were arrears and how it allocated payments.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings