What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

London Borough of Lewisham (26 008 421)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 08 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint about the Council telling her to make a council tax payment she had already paid. This is because an investigation would not add to the Council’s own investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs B complains the Council sent her reminder letters about an overdue council tax payment from April 2023 which she had paid at the time. Mrs B says she sent proof of payment to the Council twice but the Council delayed resolving the matter and the Council’s letters caused her a lot of distress. Mrs B also says the Council has changed her payment method.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In response to Mrs B’s complaint, the Council confirmed that it had now found the missing payment which it had missed due to an oversight. The Council said it should have put recovery action on hold whilst the matter was investigated and it sincerely apologised for the distress caused by the reminder notices it sent to her. The Council also offered Mrs B a financial payment of £50.
  2. The Council has provided a suitable response to Mrs B’s complaint by: identifying the claimed missing payment; accepting fault; providing a meaningful apology; and, offering a financial remedy for the distress Mrs B suffered.
  3. I find these actions put right the main injustice Mrs B has suffered and an investigation by the Ombudsman would not add to the Council’s own investigation. So, we will not investigate this complaint.
  4. The Council also says Mrs B’s payment method has not changed. Mrs B may contact the Council if there is an issue with the payment method, but the involvement of the Ombudsman is not justified.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because an investigation would not add to the Council’s own investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings