Mole Valley District Council (25 028 106)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about council tax and recovery action taken by the Council. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council notified about Council tax she owes two years after she left a property. She also complains about the Council’s decision to take recovery action and says the charges should be waived.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X was a tenant in a property from August 2022 until April 2023. In August 2023 the Council said it was contacted by Ms X’s landlord and then it notified the Valuation Office Agency about Miss X’s property.
  2. The Valuation Office Agency set the property banding in 2024. The Council said it did not have a forwarding address for Miss X. It sent a letter to property hoping it might be forward to Miss X by the landlord. In December 2025 it established Miss X’s forwarding address and sent her a bill.
  3. Miss X complains the Council should have notified her earlier about the council tax. I will not investigate this complaint. The Council followed procedures to establish a forwarding address for Miss X and sent her a bill as soon as it became aware of her address.
  4. Miss X complains about the Council taking recovery action. Miss X accepts she lived at the property. Miss X is therefore liable for the debt. The Council has a legal duty to collect council tax. It placed a hold on the account for three weeks after issuing the bill to allow Ms X to apply for benefits and discounts. It also offered to arrange a repayment plan. The organisation followed the appropriate procedures when making this decision and I cannot therefore criticise it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about council tax and recovery action taken by the Council. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings