London Borough of Newham (25 015 188)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 24 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We have upheld this complaint because the Council did not act on the information Mr X provided and failed to respond to the evidence he submitted. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint by providing a remedy for the injustice this caused.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council wrongly pursued council tax enforcement against him. He says the Council never served a summons or gave him any chance to challenge the alleged debt before it obtained a Liability Order. Despite his dispute, the Council sent the case to Enforcement Agent, which then clamped his car outside his home for more than eight days. The enforcement was later suspended, confirming the original instruction was incorrect.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. If we investigated, we would likely find fault causing injustice because the Council failed to act promptly on the evidence provided by Mr X on 15 January 2025 and continued enforcement unnecessarily.
  2. The Council had more than two months to prevent escalation but did not do so, leading to avoidable enforcement, loss of vehicle use, and distress.

Back to top

Agreed action

  1. To its credit the Council has agreed to resolve this complaint early.
  2. The Council has agreed to pay Mr X £250 for the avoidable distress and inconvenience caused by the delay and not having use of his vehicle for just over a week.
  3. The Council should complete this within one month of issuing the decision statement.
  4. The Council should provide us with evidence that the above recommendations have been completed.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We have upheld this complaint because the Council did not act on the information Mr X provided and failed to respond to his evidence. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by offering a remedy for the injustice this caused.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings