Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (25 012 829)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a council tax summons and recovery action. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation. We cannot investigate the issue of the summons.

The complaint

  1. Mr X says he had arranged for his landlord to forward his mail to him after he moved abroad. However, the Council sent council tax notices to his old address. These letters were returned to the Council as undelivered. The Council then sent a summons knowing he was not resident. The Council started enforcement action adding significant fees.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)).
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council regarding the matters set out in paragraph 1.
  2. The Council replied that Mr X had not left a forwarding address. It was not the landlord’s responsibility to provide this information. The Council was not required to locate his new address. The Council correctly sent correspondence to his last known address. The Council did not uphold Mr X’s complaint.
  3. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation because it sent notices and took enforcement action in accordance with council tax legislation.
  4. We cannot investigate the issue of the court summons as this is the commencement of court proceedings and is outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation. We cannot investigate the summons as it is the start of court action.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings