City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (25 011 368)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 14 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about enforcement of a Council tax debt because the matter has been remedied.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council obtained an attachment of earnings order to enforce a Council tax debt despite his legal order (Individual Voluntary Arrangement – IVA) preventing any further enforcement of these debts.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says that he obtained an IVA in April 2025 but an attachment of earnings order was obtained against him by the Council in May 2025.
  2. The Council says that they only received the IVA on 2 June and processed it on 27 June. The Council confirmed that two attachment of earnings payments had been deducted from his wages by June 2025. The Council asked the employer to cancel the orders and confirm that the payments had been made (so they could be refunded to Mr X). The employer initially declined as the request was not dated but the Council says it amended the request immediately. Nevertheless, the Council says that the two payments occurred before the Council could process it.
  3. The Council apologised for the delay in requesting the employer’s information about the first payment. I note there was a delay in the first refund but I consider the apology to be a remedy to this part of the complaint. I note that the second refund was delayed because the employer did not respond to this.
  4. For these reasons I am satisfied that there are no grounds to investigate this matter further.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the matter has been remedied to the Ombudsman’s satisfaction.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings